Home » News » Poll: Canadians Support Parliamentary Investigation of 9/11

Poll: Canadians Support Parliamentary Investigation of 9/11

The 30-second video above, showing the collapse of Building 7, was shown to Canadians in a poll conducted in December. After viewing the video, 53% of those polled said they either suspect or believe that the building had been brought down by controlled demolition, while only 18% still cling to the official story, i.e. that the collapse was caused by fires.

Full story is below.

Poll of Canadians Finds Popular Support for Parliamentary Review of 9/11 Commission Report


January 8, 2015

A new Canadian survey by polling firm YouGov reveals popular support and little opposition to a Parliamentary review of the 9/11 Commission Report, with 33% in favor, 26% neither for nor against, and 19% opposed.

The review was called for in a petition submitted to Parliament on December 3, 2014. The government must officially respond by January 17.

The poll was commissioned by U.S.-based Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization representing 2,300 professionals calling for a new investigation into the World Trade Center destruction, and by ReThink911 Canada, the group responsible for the petition bearing 1,427 signatures.

The two groups, together with the international 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel, held a press conference on December 10 to call upon the government to go forward with the Parliamentary review.

Among the petitioners’ concerns is the destruction of 47-storey World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7), which collapsed smoothly into its own footprint at 5:20 PM on 9/11. It was not mentioned in the 2004 9/11 Commission Report.

While a 2008 report by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that office fires caused WTC 7’s collapse, critics such as the 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel present peer-reviewed evidence that a controlled demolition, not fires, was the cause.

According to YouGov’s survey results, almost three times as many people suspect controlled demolition over fires after viewing video footage of WTC 7’s collapse. 52% are either sure or suspect that it was caused by a “controlled demolition” versus 18% who are sure or suspect ordinary fires caused it.

Regarding trustworthiness of sources, 45% are more inclined to believe critics who say explosives were used, while 16% are more inclined to believe the U.S. government

“With numbers like these, it’s difficult to tell why so many politicians and journalists are unwilling to touch this issue,” said David Long, director of ReThink911 Canada and author of the petition. “Canada has been participating in the War on Terrorism for far too long without ever critically scrutinizing the basis of it all.”

Says Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, “We’re very encouraged to see that many more Canadians are in favor of a parliamentary review than are opposed to it. If the Canadian government grants the parliamentary review, we have dozens of technical experts who would be honored to testify, and right the record on this tragic event.”

Critical questions about 9/11 are at this moment also before the U.S. Government.

House Resolution 428, currently before the U.S. House Intelligence Committee with the support of 21 cosponsors, calls for the release of 28 classified pages of a 2002 Joint Congressional Inquiry report implicating the Saudis in financing 9/11.

Former U.S. Senator Bob Graham, Chair of the Joint Congressional Inquiry, called for the release of the 28 pages at a press conference yesterday on Capitol Hill.


Click here to see full summary of the poll results

3 thoughts on “Poll: Canadians Support Parliamentary Investigation of 9/11

  1. Maybe WTC 7 was prewired for controlled demolition early on so it could be quickly demolished in an emergency requiring evacuation, so as to prevent any classified materials it contained from being removed by unauthorized persons. This could be standard secret procedure for certain buildings holding classified government materials. Larry Silverstein would have been told. If this is true, the supposed need to keep it secret would be used internally as a rational to persuade people with pieces of the truth not to discuss what they know publicly. It would be one rational among others deployed for that purpose in various contexts, part of a series of seemingly legitimate private arguments, planned in advance by a small group of high level plotters, for enforcing silence about this or that aspect of their hideous total crime. It would not be the whole truth even about WTC 7, just one piece of how the whole crime and its cover-up were accomplished.  

  2. we don’t need any more ZOG “investigations” of ZOG-linked atrocities. The results are predictable. We’ll get the truth about 9/11 – all of it – when the current Zionist-Globalist Occupation government has been liquidated. Not until

  3. You’re probably right. It will amount to nothing. But the real story here is how many people no longer believe the official lie.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s